News & Events

Photo: California Assembly Bill 1910, “Golf Endangerment Act,” dies in the State Legislature. Again.

Play on...

California Assembly Bill 1910, “Golf Endangerment Act,” dies in the State Legislature. Again.

May 23, 2022by - San Francisco Public Golf Alliance

California Assembly Bill AB1910, a proposed law targeting the State’s public golf courses for housing development, died last week in a May 19 Suspense File Hearing of the State Assembly’s fiscal watchdog Appropriations Committee.   Thus ended an 18-month anti-golf campaign by California’s powerful development industry, its cheerleaders, lobbyists and Assembly Member Cristina Garcia, author of AB-1910 and its precursor, Assembly Bill 672.  

Both bills – AB-1910 and 627 – were unanimously and vigorously opposed by the golf community, which dubbed the bills “The Golf Endangerment Act” and wrote thousands of objection letters to legislators and over 250 individual and organizational letters to the Assembly Housing, Local Government, and Appropriations committees.  Objections to AB-1910 included:

  • Golf is a broadly and diversely popular and physically and mentally healthful recreation enjoyed by millions of Californians, and has enjoyed record-high popularity during the Covid pandemic.
  • The public courses are the most affordable and accessible to youth, seniors, women, and racial and ethnic minorities, and are the home courses for high school teams and valuable youth mentoring and support programs.
  • The golf courses are parks that provide open space and related environmental benefits to their communities – trees and native vegetation to provide habitat for birds and small animals, absorb urban heat and cool and freshen urban air, sequester carbon and groundwater, and drain stormwater.
  • The policy analysts for both the Housing and Local Government committees noted that inconsistency with provisions of the Surplus Land Act means that  AB-1910 may not result in any new public housing being built.  

The parks and open space advocate non-profit Trust for Public Land joined the objectors to AB-1910, pointing to recent fierce Southern California open space battles between developers and park activists, and objecting that AB-1910 would impede the public’s future ability to protect open space.    

Play on...

By contrast, the Assembly committees received less than 20 letters supporting AB-1910, mostly from YIMBY chapters.

In 2021 an early (April 6, 2021) version of the precursor Assembly Bill 672  targeted virtually all California golf courses – both public and private – for a mandatory zoning change, exempt from California Environmental Quality Act review -- to enable affordable housing development. That version of the bill was subsequently modified, and ultimately died in January 2022 at an Assembly Appropriations Suspense File hearing. The AB-1910 that was Held by Appropriations on May 19 envisioned a State Government-driven program to pay cities to voluntarily convert their publicly owned golf courses to dense housing developments, reserving 25%  of units for low income, and only 15% of the land for open space.  

This was not the first time golf has been attacked by political leaders.  In fact, such attacks have been part of golf since its first mention in the English language: a 1457 Act of the Scottish Parliament banning golf and football, because these sports diverted young men from their archery practice.

Nor is AB-1910 likely to be the last such attack. The bill’s author Assembly Member Cristina Garcia is retiring from the Assembly at the end of the 2022 Legislative Year. But she is hoping for someone to “pick up the mantle.”  

If and when that happens, we’ll notify and ask you to write another letter. Again. 


Southern California Golf Association Letter to Appropriations Committee, 5.15.22

California Alliance for Golf Letter to Appropriations Committee, 5.6.22

United States Golf Association Letter to Appropriations Committee, 5.17.22

San Francisco Public Golf Alliance letter to Appropriations Committee, 5.9.22

Bay Area Golf Club of Northern California letter to Local Government Committee, 3.1.22